PJ Lehrer is an Adjunct Assistant Professor at NYU, teaching Consumer Behavior and Strategic Planning For Marketers.
Prof Lehrer's blog is syndicated by Newstex/ACI information Group.
Prior to moving into academia, PJ spent 20+ years working in advertising, primarily at large multi-national agencies, including McCann-Erickson and Grey on premier pieces of business such as AT&T, L’Oreal and Kraft/GF. One of the highlights of her career was orchestrating the global launch of Lucent Technologies, which garnered a Silver Effie and a Grand AME award.
Her latest book: "That's Not Why You Bought The Rolex." is now available on barnesandnoble.com and amazon.com
As
someone who doesn't play games, online or off, I was a bit surprised to see a
new survey by social gaming network PlayPhone found that 68% of mobile gamers
are women. 61% of them play at home in
their living rooms, and nearly a third of those play in the evening. (Baar,
2014)
In an attempt to engage consumers via user-generated
content, PepsiCo is bringing Vines submitted by users to digital billboards in
the UK.
In support of Pepsi Max's "Unbelievable"
campaign, PepsiCo is inviting British consumers to submit Vines showing
themselves doing something that defies imagination, along with the hashtag
#LiveForNow. (Sass, 2014)
I can certainly see people in engaging some foolhardy
behavior in pursuit of their 15 minutes of fame , but I'm not so sure they will
buy more Pepsi Max. What do you think?
Just in time for Valentine's Day, Tiffany, Target and
Helzberg have joined the 'No Dirty Gold' movement. According to the EPA, mining continues to be
the country's most toxic industry. And a
single gold ring creates about 20 tons of mine waste. That's pretty horrifying.
The group's pact includes a promise to study metals supply
chain, improve supplier sourcing criteria, increase recycled gold content, and
seek more responsibly produced metals. (Mahoney,
2014)
So what do you think?Will this turn you into a Tiffany shopper?
I used to think that the worst
thing that could happen with celebrity advertising was that people would be so
distracted by the celebrity that they would forget to notice what brand they
were pushing. Then I started to be
concerned about the shill factor when the same celebrities seemed to be selling
many products, most of which they didn't even bother to use.
But this week a new possibility
emerged -- what happens if your celebrity turns on you?
Amitabh Bachchan, an Indian
movie icon, who has been associated with Pepsi for eight years had a change of
heart after a school girl asked him "why he was promoting a drink that her
teacher maintained was poisonous." Hmm.
After some soul searching Amitabh has decided to end his relationship
with the brand noting that he doesn't endorse tobacco or alcohol either. Wow.
I'm sure that is an association that Pepsi doesn't need. (Forbes, 2014)
So what do you think? Have you ever bought something because a celebrity
endorsed it? Do you think the use of celebrities
in marketing is a good strategy? Or is
it time to find another approach?
After a year of declining sales,
Volkswagen is taking a variety of steps to get the brand back on the acceleration
track. Strategically, they have decided
to focus on the fact that they have more cars on the road with 100,000 miles or
more than any other brand. (Greenberg, 2014)
It's an interesting strategy, but
will it get them on the consideration list for Gen Y?
Greenberg, K. (2014, January
29) VW's Brand Strategy Hones In On
Product. mediapost.com. Retrieved
January 31, 2014, from
As Twitter evolves we are seeing
a definite minority skew for the medium, with African-Americans, Latinos and
Asian-Americans accounting for 41% of total users versus 34% for Facebook and
33% for total Internet users.
While the company is focusing on
growing its Latino audience, its current sweet spot is young African
Americans. 40% of African-American
Internet users between the ages of 18-29 use Twitter compared with 28% of
Whites in that age group. (Koh, 2014)
Advertisers that have taken
notice and are doing something about it include AllState, Home Depot and
"12 Years A Slave." I imagine
that others will soon follow.
Koh, Y. (2014, January 21) Twitter's Racial Diversity Becomes Plum
Selling Point. Wall Street Journal. p.B1, B4
Every year when I read the post
game commentary about the Super Bowl ads I am appalled. Apparently most of these so called experts
have forgotten that the purpose of advertising is to sell stuff. Instead of commenting on perceived
effectiveness they stoop to the level of non-marketers and discuss which
commercials they found most entertaining. Who cares?
So a big thanks to Communicus
for trying to see if any of the ads actually work. And, guess what? Most don't.
Based on a new study which tracked purchase intent, pre and post, four
out of five Super Bowl commercials failed to deliver. At $4 million a pop (plus production) that
sure is a lot of wasted money. (Loechner, 2014)
I was not surprised to read that
the Mercedes "Soul" commercial, which was at norm for likeability was
a winner in terms of purchase intent. It
featured a clear message that I thought young men would find appealing. I was actually surprised that it wasn't
better liked. Here it is so you can take
a second look.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGcaqQnqTJI
And this year, when you watch
the Super Bowl ads think a bit about whether they make you want to buy
something before you decide which ones you think are good. You may be surprised at the answer.
Loechner, J. (2014, January 16) But Will The Dogs Eat It? mediapost.com. Retrieved January 16, 2014, from http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/217209/but-will-the-dogs-eat-it.html