Last
week Governor Cuomo announced a new
solution had been found to address the problems of the L train that would allow
it to remain open part time over the next two years, rather than shutting down
entirely. People were shocked. The
closure had been a hot topic of discussion for three long years. And no one ever mentioned an alternative
solution. (Fitzsimmons, 2019)
But
the turnabout was a perfect example of what happens when you reframe a
problem. Let me explain. The first step in problem-solving is to
define the problem. As I often tell
participants in the workshops I facilitate, this step is critical because if
you misdefine the problem you will head down the wrong path. Our decisions are shaped by experience, which
is a good thing. But sometimes we take
shortcuts and simply repeat actions that have worked in the past without
exploring alternative solutions. That's what happened here.
In the
case of the L train this meant defining the problem as "How do we fix the L
train cables that were damaged by Hurricane Sandy?" Brainstorming then focused on the ways in
which this task could be accomplished; with agreement eventually being reached
that the best thing to do was to close down the line for two years so the walls
could be ripped open and the work completed.
But,
Gov. Cuomo decided to enlist some of our local talent and consulted with professors
at Columbia and Cornell about options.
They started by redefining the problem, because it had not been properly
defined in the first place. It really
was: "How do we get a properly working cable system for the L
train?" The key of course was not
repairing the damaged cables, but bypassing them altogether and putting in a
new system. Given the age of the New
York Subway system this makes complete sense and while the system may be new to
NYC, it is currently being used in London, HK, and Riyadh. So it's been well vetted.
And
the best part is instead of closing down entirely for 15 months, the L train
will be open during the week, and will have limited availability on the
weekends, with work ending in 20 months.
Nice. It may even cost less. Think about that the next time you define a
problem.
Fitzsimmons,
E. (2019, January 4) The L Train
Shutdown Plan Was 3 Years in the Making.
It Unraveled in 3 Weeks. nytimes.com.
Retrieved January 5, 2019, from
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/04/nyregion/l-train-shutdown.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
2 comments:
What a refreshing idea! I'm surprised to hear that the governor and the MTA decided to use the intellectual capital of its own city. During my years at NYU I depended on the L train a lot and I'm glad to hear that it won't close down in its entirety for 15 months.
However if Gov. Cuomo asked NYU grads for a solution, we could probably make it happen in 10 months instead of 20.
Adam
I know. I was so bummed that NYU was not included. ;-)
Post a Comment