Tuesday, December 31, 2019
Wednesday, December 25, 2019
Nancy Pelosi demonstrates how to control the narrative.
On
December 18, 2019, The House of Representatives impeached President Trump for Abuse
of Power and Obstruction of Congress.
The
next step in the process is for the Senate to hold a trial.
Unfortunately,
Mitch McConnell the Speaker of the Senate, indicated on October 8, 2019, that
he was coordinating preparations for the trial with the White House counsel. Do you suppose that he forgot that Senators
act as jurors in an impeachment trial? Surely
the jury should not be coordinating their efforts with either side.
But he
doubled down on December 17th on CNN when he announced: "I'm not an
impartial juror." (Barrett & Zaslav,
2019)
Hmm. Perhaps he shouldn't be a juror at all
then. And what about that pesky oath he
took to uphold the constitution? Doesn't
it preclude attempting to turn an impeachment trial into a sham?
Enter
Nancy to the rescue.
The
intrepid Speaker of The House announced on December 19th that she would not send
the articles of impeachment to the Senate until they indicated what the rules
of the trial would be. And, wait for it
- that it will be a fair trial. (Hughes &
Andrews, 2019)
Then
she sent everyone home for the holidays ensuring that the main topic of
conversation at family gatherings over the next two weeks will be - "Why
won't the Senate hold a fair trial? What
do they have to hide?" It's
brilliant.
According
to an ABC/Washington Post poll released on December 17th, 70% of Americans think
that Trump's aides should testify at the trial.
That figure includes 64% of Republicans, 72% of Independents and 79% of
Democrats. (Langer, 2019)
So
this is not a partisan issue. But rather
one that all Americans care deeply about.
That makes me think some Senators may come back from break with a whole
new attitude.
Thanks
Nancy.
Barrett,
T. & Zaslav, A. (2019, December 17) Mitch McConnell: 'I'm not an impartial
juror' ahead of Senate impeachment trial.
cnn.com. Retrieved December 24, 209, from
Hughes,
S. & Andrews, P. (2019, December 20)
Pelosi to Delay Sending Impeachment Articles to Senate. wsj.com. Retrieved December 24, 2019, from https://www.wsj.com/articles/after-house-impeaches-trump-timing-of-next-steps-is-unclear-11576755097
Langer,
G. (2019, December 17) Most expect fair
trial for Trump; 7 in 10 say let aides testify (POLL) abcnews.go.com.
Retrieved December 24, 2019, from https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/expect-fair-trial-trump-10-aides-testify-poll/story?id=67761813
Wednesday, December 18, 2019
Peloton may have the last laugh.
When
the controversy broke out about the Peloton ad, Sarah Mahoney of mediapost.com
noted that her first impression upon seeing the commercial was that it was
unlikely to be successful. (Mahoney, 2019)
I realized
belatedly that I too had seen it, but not remembered it because 1) I am not in
the market for an exercise bike and 2) the ad was meh.
So it
may just turn out to be a stroke of good luck that Peloton got a much needed PR
boost from people who are unlikely to ever be users of their product. And what a boost it is. Eva Victor's parody of the commercial on
Twitter has over 3 million views. (Ortiz,
2019)
Then
Ryan Reynolds put his own twist on it for Aviation America Gin. And just how much do you think that mention
on Saturday Night Live was worth? (Hsu,
2019)
In one
of the many articles written about Peloton since the controversy erupted, I
read something interesting, which sadly I cannot attribute, but will paraphrase
and share anyway. "My Twitter
friends are outraged. My Facebook
friends have no idea what's going on. And my Instagram friends all want a bike."
Yeah. That sounds just about right to me.
Mahoney,
S. (2019, December 8) What The Peloton
Backlash Says About the D2C Universe. mediapost.com. Retrieved December 18, 2019, from
Ortiz,
A. (2019, December 3) Peloton Ad Is
Criticized as Sexist and Dystopian. nytimes.com.
Retrieved December 18, 2019, from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/03/business/peloton-bike-ad-stock.html
Hsu,
T. (2019, December 9) Peloton's Cringe-y
Ad Got Everyone Talking. Its C.E.O. Is Silent. nytimes.com. Retrieved
December 18, 2019 from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/09/business/media/peloton-ad-ryan-reynolds.html
Wednesday, December 11, 2019
Amazon demonstrates how to change the narrative.
Amazon
has been getting some really bad press lately. Workers are rallying over high
injury rates - more than double the national average according to The Center
For Investigative Reporting. The New York Times wrote a multiple page
cover story about Amazon's $15.40 wages and the company's effect on Baltimore. And then there's the fact that Amazon paid $0 in federal taxes this year, for the second year in a row. LOL. (Evans, 2019)
So
what is Amazon going to do? They could
improve working conditions for their employees.
But why bother when they can simply change the narrative?
Research
shows us that once we believe something to be true, we block out messages that
challenge those beliefs; and listen more closely to those that support
them. So just pointing out that Amazon
donated $250,000 to food banks in 2019, was enough to convince my students that
they didn't need to give up the convenience of Amazon even if Amazon's
practices conflict with their values.
You
can read their comments here...
Maybe Amazon did. Because on December 3, two days
after the story ran in the New York Times, Amazon announced their new
"Toys for Tots" holiday partnership featuring Robert Downey Jr. (Gazdik, 2019)
That
should certainly distract everyone.
At the
very least it will influence Google's algorithm so that when people search for
Amazon, the negative stories aren't the first to pop up.
And
that's the beauty of changing the narrative.
It's just so darn easy these days.
SiLive
(2019, Monday November 25) Amazon
Donates Dinners While Employees Protest Safety Issues. mediapost.com. Retrieved November 27, 2019, from
Kovach,
S. & Pagano, A. (2019, February 14) Amazon will pay $0 in federal taxes
this year - here's how the $793 billion company gets away with it. thebusinessinsider.com. retrieved December 11, 2019, from https://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-not-paying-taxes-trump-bezos-2018-4
Wednesday, December 4, 2019
Would you buy a candy bar or two to get free shipping?
As
more purchases move online the candy companies are facing a dilemma.
According
to Hershey's 56% of shoppers always or often buy a snack at checkout. No doubt due in part to frustration from waiting
on long checkout lines. (Gasparro, 2017)
But
how can candy companies replicate that in an online environment?
Some are
trying to use the same technique and are offering up a variety of items at the
end of the transaction under headlines like - "have you forgotten,"
or "other people have purchased."
But a
more interesting idea might be to help consumers reach their free shipping
minimums. We've all experienced that
moment when you realize that you are just a few dollars short of free shipping,
so you buy one more item to reach the threshold. Why can't that item be a candy bar or two?
Another
option would be to offer customers a coupon to get them to add the item to
their list. Once a product is on the
list, chances are that it will remain there and be repurchased.
So what
do you think? Do you make impulse
purchases online? What prompted the
purchase, and what did you buy? Do you
think any of the ideas discussed will be effective? Do you have a different idea that might work?
Gasparro,
A & Haddon, H. (2017, October 16)
Food Companies Revamp for a Digital World. wsj.com.
Retrieved August 13, 2018, from https://www.wsj.com/articles/can-food-companies-get-people-to-make-impulse-purchases-online-1508119561
Geller,
G. (2019, December 3) Recreating The
Impulse Buy Online. mediapost.com. Retrieved
December 4, 2019, from
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)